I'm confused.
To reverse the call on the field, there must be "indisputable video evidence". What we were seeing, IMO and the announcers' opinions, did not reach that level of certainty. Question: Do the replay officials have additional video that we do not see?
They had already moved the chains. How do the officials reconstruct the previous line of scrimmage from which to make that measurement?
That call reversal flipped the field, had us battling most of the quarter to recover from that, and, had the potential to change the game's outcome.
However, once again this Army team showed its grit, did not flinch, and delivered another victory.
Well done Army!
To reverse the call on the field, there must be "indisputable video evidence". What we were seeing, IMO and the announcers' opinions, did not reach that level of certainty. Question: Do the replay officials have additional video that we do not see?
They had already moved the chains. How do the officials reconstruct the previous line of scrimmage from which to make that measurement?
That call reversal flipped the field, had us battling most of the quarter to recover from that, and, had the potential to change the game's outcome.
However, once again this Army team showed its grit, did not flinch, and delivered another victory.
Well done Army!
